Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X
