Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.88 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
