Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 150g / 5291oz and a ergonomics of 6.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
