Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs and a weight of 150g / 5291oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
