Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 150g / 5291oz and a ergonomics of 6.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
