Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
