Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.88 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Solid value at €367.40, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
