Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.88 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
