Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD, 25QD, left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10924-025
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €312.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size25
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-305
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.07 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables