Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (7) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
