Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and total score (7.88 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
