Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
