Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
