Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the total score (8.99 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
