Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €210.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
