Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
