Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
