Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.8 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €110.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
