Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

78.80 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €151.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

75.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn 2020 Clash II?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques