Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a weight of 170g / 6oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX
