Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
