Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
