Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX and Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
