Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
