Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
