Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
