Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
