Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT

Spinning

4000 D-cx

84.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.3 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €176.20
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a durability of 8.53 out of 10, while Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques