Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
