Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.53 out of 10 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
