Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the total score (8.99 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
