Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
