Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €79.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the total score (7.9 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques