Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
52.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX
