Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
66.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.81 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €112.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and the durability (8.53 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
