Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
