Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
71.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa TD Match 3012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa TD Match 3012X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa TD Match?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD Match 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
