Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
