Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
