Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch) and the maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
