Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 2000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-200
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €159.80
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A, 10000 PG, left and right hand, Saltwater fishing reel, Front Drag, SRG10000SWAPG
Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A
Seafishing
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.76 out of 10
Ergonomics5.42 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight685g / 24.16oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €229.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size10000 PG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/210

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, while Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A?

There are not much differences between the two comparables