Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI

Spinning

59.60 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.91 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight305g / 10.76oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €44.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.