Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Complex XR 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Complex XR 2500X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Complex XR?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
