Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the total score (7.9 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles