Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

86.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.73 out of 10

Ergonomics5.76 out of 10

Gear ratio4.6:1

Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs

Weight450g / 15.87oz

Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, while Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX

A line retrieval (per crank) of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits