Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tekota?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
