Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
