Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
