Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
