Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
