Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
